@Neil Roy:
I understand that bugs happen, even big ones. I can live with that. BUT, my MAIN issue with all of this is the idea that Mozilla can arbitrarily decided that I CANNOT USE MY EXTENSIONS ON MY COMPUTER!!!!! HOW DARE THEY presume authority over what I CAN RUN!!! There should at the very least be a switch in advanced to enable all extensions no matter what the risk, perhaps display a warning with “ARE YOU SURE, THIS IS NOT SAFE”. But to just POOF, disable them all without asking me if that is okay makes me blind raging FURIOUS! Don’t treat me like an idiot who can’t make his own decisions, I am not a kid!

@Moonchild @ On why Iceweasel-UXP doesn't include WebExtensions.:
It exposes one of the multiple hacks Mozilla has used to make WE work in the first place, and maybe even a fundamental flaw in how WebExtensions work, overall (I haven't had time to fully analyze the problem yet). Since it's at the very root of the implementation of WEs and how they interact with web content, I also don't see a straightforward way around that problem.

The issue is that in an effort to hide the fact that a certain extension is installed by randomizing access URLs, that randomized nature creates a unique fingerprint for content to read. So you're in effect going from "this user has extension X installed, it could be user Y or anyone else we've seen with this extension" to "this is user Y". As you can understand, that's a problem ;) -- since the WE needs to know its own random ID so it can access its resources from page content, that ID can't change once it's been established.

Aside from this privacy issue, our continued experimental support in Basilisk depends on how much of a problem our limited implementation (restricting WEs to only content-related functions and not exposing many browser-specific APIs, because that is what we have our other extension types for) poses. Time will tell.

@TCH:
a bugrókát jellemzően kockák használják, akik gyűlölik a reklámokat

@Ádám:
Ezt megcáfolnám (legalábbis itt magyarba), a hozzánk behozott szétbaszott gépek több mint felén a tűzróka az alapértelmezett böngésző.

@Ádám:
Ez mótvá? "A winfostíz nagyonfasza a gémereknek..."

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/debtags", line 25, in <module>
    import apt
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/__init__.py", line 23, in <module>
    import apt_pkg
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'apt_pkg'

cd /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/
ln -s apt_pkg.cpython-3*m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so apt_pkg.so